Notes |
(0001485)
gordonv (developer)
2005-05-09 12:18
|
This issue is not being addressed at this time. The SV-EC did not
agree with the semantics of the proposed solution. The basic
understanding of the SV-EC was that a ##0 repeats the delay on
the clock 0 times. Since 0 iterations of a delay never delays,
a ##0 in a clocking block never has any impact.
See the SV-EC minutes for 05/09/2005 for official minutes. |
|
(0003576)
mehdi_mohtashemi (manager)
2007-04-06 11:04
|
Approved on March.5.2007 unanimously, covered by 890. |
|
(0003577)
mehdi_mohtashemi (manager)
2007-04-06 11:06
|
This is NOT a bug, it needs to be CLOSED, covered by 890, as voted on March 5.2007. |
|