| Anonymous | Login | 2010-09-03 01:59 PDT |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Docs | Wiki |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Wiki ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| 0002513 | [SystemVerilog P1800] SV-BC | major | 2008-11-03 14:43 | 2009-07-01 22:01 | |||
| Reporter | Erik_Seligman | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | Dmitry Korchemny | ||||||
| Priority | immediate | Resolution | fixed | ||||
| Status | closed | Product Version | P1800-2009/D8 Ballot | ||||
| Summary | 0002513: Ballot comment #142: BNF needs fixes to allow checkers in packages | ||||||
| Description |
Due to an oversight in the implementation of proposal 1900, the BNF does not allow checkers in packages even though the text specifically allows it. Dmitry has submitted a fix to enable this. It's too late to change things other than as a ballot issue-- but we need to make this a friendly amendment on the ballot, to enable an LRM consistent with its BNF. Note that VPI fixes may also be desirable here, but are not covered in this proposal. |
||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Type | Errata | ||||||
| Attached Files |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Relationships |
||||||
|
||||||
Notes |
|
|
Erik_Seligman (developer) 2008-11-11 07:41 |
On 2513 (http://www.verilog.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3940&type=bug) [^] we received YES votes from Abi, Mirek, Dmitry, Gord, and Manisha, and no NO votes or explicit abstensions. While this doesn't quite make quorum for an official vote, I think we can consider it passing, since this was an informal vote to decide whether to push this as a ballot issue (since it's too late for real changes.) So Intel will make this a friendly amendment at balloting. |
|
Erik_Seligman (developer) 2008-11-11 09:47 |
Ticket technically should not be Resolved, since we had a straw poll rather than a binding vote. |
|
shalom (manager) 2009-04-13 07:43 |
Ballot comment 142. Must Be Satsified? Yes What about VPI? |
|
mmaidment (manager) 2009-04-15 12:54 |
Discussion on VPI indicated that adding to VPI should be deferred to a future revision of the LRM. |
|
mmaidment (manager) 2009-05-04 00:47 |
On April 30, 2009 the SV-BC unanimously approved the attached proposal. |
|
Neil Korpusik (administrator) 2009-05-16 19:33 |
The proposal was unanimously approved by the Champions in the email vote that ended on May 14th, 2009. |
|
Neil Korpusik (administrator) 2009-06-01 10:11 |
The proposal was unanimously approved by the Working Group in the conference call of May 28, 2009. |
|
Stuart Sutherland (manager) 2009-06-24 21:24 |
Requested changes completed in draft 9. |
|
Brad Pierce (developer) 2009-07-01 18:09 |
Implementation is correct. |
| Mantis 1.1.7[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |